Project Valuation under Ambiguity
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper examines the valuation of risky projects in a setting where the investor’s probability estimates for future states of nature are ambiguous and where he or she can invest both in a portfolio of projects and securities in financial markets. This setting is relevant to investors who allocate resources to industrial research and development projects or make venture capital investments whose success probabilities may be hard to estimate. Here, we employ the Choquet-Expected Utility (CEU) model to capture the ambiguity in probability estimates and the investor’s attitude towards ambiguity. Projects are valued using breakeven selling and buying prices, which are obtained by solving several mixed asset portfolio selection (MAPS) models. Specifically, we formulate the MAPS model for CEU investors, and show that a project’s breakeven prices for (i) investors exhibiting constant absolute risk aversion and for (ii) investors using Wald’s maximin criterion can be obtained by solving two MAPS problems. We also show that breakeven prices are consistent with options pricing analysis when the investor is a nonexpected utility maximizer. The valuation procedure is demonstrated through numerical experiments.
منابع مشابه
Adverse Selection Under Ambiguity∗ Job Market Paper
This paper analyses a bilateral trade problem with asymmetric information and ambiguity aversion. There is a buyer and a seller who bargain over the exchange of an indivisible good. The seller is privately informed about the quality of the good, which determines both his valuation and the buyer’s valuation. In the absence of ambiguity, the contract that maximizes the buyer’s payoff is a posted ...
متن کاملPricing risk and ambiguity: the effect of perspective taking.
In the valuation of uncertain prospects, a difference is often observed between selling and buying perspectives. This paper distinguishes between risk (known probabilities) and ambiguity (unknown probabilities) in decisions under uncertainty and shows that the valuation disparity increases under ambiguity compared to risk. It is found that both the comparative versus noncomparative evaluation o...
متن کاملAmbiguity Aversion in Real Options
Real option valuation has traditionally been concerned with investment under project value uncertainty while assuming the agent has perfect confidence in a specific model. However, agents do not generally have perfect confidence in their model and this model uncertainty affects their decisions. In this work, we introduce a simple model for real option valuation to account for the agent’s aversi...
متن کاملDecreasing aversion under ambiguity
Under which condition does the set of desirable uncertain prospects expand when wealth increases? We show that the decreasing concavity (DC) of the utility function is necessary and sufficient in the −maxmin expected utility model. In the smooth ambiguity aversion model with the ambiguity valuation function , the DC of and of ◦ is necessary and sufficient. An alternative definition of d...
متن کاملValuation of Self-Insurance and Self-Protection under Ambiguity: Experimental Evidence
This experimental study, first, compares the individual valuations of two risk reduction mechanisms: self-insurance and self-protection. Second, it investigates these valuations when the loss amount is ambiguous, and compare these values with valuations when loss amounts are known. results confirm that there exists no “framing effect” due to the two risk reduction mechanisms. Ambiguity in the l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004